Draft 1
In the opening passage of Edward P. Jones's The Known World, Jones introduces Moses's character as hard-working, close to nature, and slightly distant. He does this by writing from Moses's perspective, presenting selection details about Moses, and the heavily nature-focused imagery.
Moses appears to be hard-working because he's the last to leave the fields—"he worked again well after he ended the day for the other adults" and he's been in the field for 15 hours. Furthermore, we learn that he's the only man to taste the dirt, to check the health of the field. These details tell us what Moses is too humble to tell us in his own narration.
While written from Moses's point of view, the narration is largely objective. We only receive small glimpses into Moses's mind—most of the attention is focused outward. But this choice is purposeful, in itself reflective of his personality. Moses focuses on his environment and is not really an introspective man. We see that Moses is a simple man who appreciates the world around him. The author tells us that soil ties him to "the only thing in his small world" that he valued as much as his own life.
In fact, Moses has a "relationship" with the dirt, tasting it at different times of year to notice how the plants affected the taste. With his Biblical name, it's not so strange for the author to present the image of Moses disrobing and lying down in his barren muddy field, being cleansed by the rain. Moses "[loses] himself completely" in the rain—unlike most people, Moses feels completely at one with nature, perhaps because the water and dirt purify him.
But perhaps his closeness to nature comes at the price of distance from people. Jones provides us certain plaintive details, offered matter-of-factly: his wife and son never wait for him to come and eat with them, and Moses often doesn't return to the cabin to sleep, instead sleeping in the fields.
Essentially, Jones uses Moses's spare point-of-view, selects details that give us insight into Moses's relationships with others, and images of Moses absorbed by nature to illustrate that Moses is a solitary man ,who feels more at home outside than in his own cabin.
Score:4

Revision:
In The Known World, Edward P. Jones bridges contrasting ideas like freedom and bondage through Moses’s connection to nature and his responsibilities. Moses himself discusses his “relationship” with the soil, and while Moses understands the shackles that chain both his mind and body, he embraces the very land that enslaves him. Jones depicts Moses as a man seeking spiritual freedom through his connection to nature with rich imagery and shifts from objectivity to far more emotional and powerful tones.
The first line of the novel establishes Moses's characteristic diligence by showing how Moses continues to work "well after he ended the day for the other adults" even though "his master died" (ll.1-2). Because Moses would have technically been freed by the death of his master, his continuation of slave work portrays him as a man who is hardworking and persistent, never willing to submit to pain or fatigue. Here, the tone is objective due to the lack of adjectives: he discusses the death of his master without emotion, and doesn’t complain about working late.We see that the narration is fairly aloof, leaving us to draw our own conclusions about Moses’s character.
The tone grows more introspective, however, as the imagery shifts the focus to nature. Jones writes, "July dirt tasted even more like sweetened metal than the dirt of June or May" (l. 33-34). Indeed, Moses seems to appreciate his bondage for it has created not just a learning opportunity, but an even stronger bond to the world around him. In other words, Moses has learned to distinguish the flavor of the very dirt he has worked in over the years, hinting that he has a unique understanding of the world that has been cultivated by his work as a slave. By describing Moses’s appreciation of the "sour moldiness" of the environment with the coming of fall and winter and the end of his relationship with the soil, Jones further conveys Moses’s keen sense of taste and his unusual connection with the dirt. He also crafts an unusual tone of intimacy by choosing to use the word relationship. (l. 48) Relationship are generally reserved for the connection between two or more people to suggest a bond of love or hate, and the choice of diction truly emphasizes Moses bond with nature over anyone else.
But as the subject of Moses’s thoughts becomes more melancholy, Jones returns to a matter-of-fact tone, perhaps hinting that Moses doesn’t want to dwell on sadness. The focus shifts to Moses’s family life, where we learn that “his wife knew enough now not to wait for him to come and eat with them.” (ll. 55-56). We learn nothing about his wife or son; the fact that Moses often doesn’t return home at night, but ventures into a field is infinitely more telling about his distant relationship with his family. While most farmers toil impartially at their fields, Moses’s relationship is unusually emotional, the kind of closeness that most people save for others of their kind.
The end of the passage offers yet another shift to a rather reverent tone. Jones employs an interesting metaphor through the use of water. Moses seems to have a particular attraction to water. In fact, he eventually washes his face with rainwater and strips down naked to allow the water to envelop his body (ll. 81-82). Jones is painting Moses as man aware of the four humors, and especially aware of one of the most crucial elements of human life--water. The rainfall symbolically frees Moses of the dirt which he himself had consumed and essentially covered himself with. While he accepts his role as a slave and caters it to his own will during the day, Moses truly wants to be free to experience the world through a new lens. That is the very reason why he would "blame the chains on evenings such as these" (5); he wants to be washed of his bondage, and sitting in the rain allows him to do that.
It’s clear that the nature of Moses’s relationship with the earth he slaves over is complex. Jones clearly depicts Moses as appreciative of the world around him. Ironically, the freedom Moses desires and the shackles that keep him from it have the same source -- nature.
Score: 24/25
Reflection:
My first draft was very rough—it rambled, lacked specific details or textual support, and a clear thesis. I suspect that this was a result of my not reading the prompt well—I didn't take much time trying to understand the nuances of it, just read it through once or twice and started writing, afraid that I'd run out of time. I realize now, having read College Board's benchmark essays, that for the prose passage questions, it's imperative that I work through the text very carefully. I missed out on many details—that Moses was a slave!—that definitely would've improved my essay.
For this second draft, my group took Nihar's original essay as our basis. We then rewrote his thesis, and added paragraphs to develop imagery and tone as our literary techniques. I had struggled to organize my first draft—I tried to subvert the 5 paragraph essay structure, but wasn't sure how. Using the tone shifts to organize our essay definitely helped the writing flow better, and provided a natural way for us to incorporate analysis of tone. Plus, identifying the irony of Moses's situation (being enslaved by nature but also turning to it for emotional release) helped us write a more complex essay.
In future, I will definitely spend more time analyzing the passage I'm given, looking specifically for the binary opposites, the tone shifts, and the author's word choice. I'll develop a more complex thesis that addresses the big picture (what is this passage really about?) instead of narrowly answering the prompt.
It’s clear that the nature of Moses’s relationship with the earth he slaves over is complex. Jones clearly depicts Moses as appreciative of the world around him. Ironically, the freedom Moses desires and the shackles that keep him from it have the same source -- nature.
Score: 24/25
Reflection:
My first draft was very rough—it rambled, lacked specific details or textual support, and a clear thesis. I suspect that this was a result of my not reading the prompt well—I didn't take much time trying to understand the nuances of it, just read it through once or twice and started writing, afraid that I'd run out of time. I realize now, having read College Board's benchmark essays, that for the prose passage questions, it's imperative that I work through the text very carefully. I missed out on many details—that Moses was a slave!—that definitely would've improved my essay.
For this second draft, my group took Nihar's original essay as our basis. We then rewrote his thesis, and added paragraphs to develop imagery and tone as our literary techniques. I had struggled to organize my first draft—I tried to subvert the 5 paragraph essay structure, but wasn't sure how. Using the tone shifts to organize our essay definitely helped the writing flow better, and provided a natural way for us to incorporate analysis of tone. Plus, identifying the irony of Moses's situation (being enslaved by nature but also turning to it for emotional release) helped us write a more complex essay.
In future, I will definitely spend more time analyzing the passage I'm given, looking specifically for the binary opposites, the tone shifts, and the author's word choice. I'll develop a more complex thesis that addresses the big picture (what is this passage really about?) instead of narrowly answering the prompt.